Adriana headshot

Adriana Piñon

Legal Director

Legal

Bio

Adriana Piñon serves as the legal director of the ACLU of Texas, providing strategic leadership and managing the team’s litigation and non-litigation legal advocacy.

She joined the ACLU of Texas in 2012 as a senior staff attorney and later served as policy counsel and senior staff attorney. Her work has focused on a variety of constitutional issues on the state and local level, including her involvement in a high-profile case challenging Texas’ six-week abortion ban, S.B.8. 

Prior to working at the ACLU of Texas, Adriana was a staff attorney at the New York Civil Liberties Union, where she litigated cases concerning violations of equal protection, the fourth amendment, free speech, and due process, among other constitutional matters. 

Adriana graduated magna cum laude from Harvard University in 1998 with a bachelor’s degree in History and Science, and received her law degree from Columbia University School of Law in 2007 with special recognition for her work in international law.

Featured Work

News & Commentary
Two people holding signs that say Bans off our bodies
  • Reproductive Freedom|
  • +1 Issue

A New Texas Law Threatens to Eliminate Abortion Access. We’re Suing to Stop It.

SB 8 is not just sinister, it’s unconstitutional.
News & Commentary
287g
  • Border and Immigrants’ Rights|
  • +1 Issue

3 Reasons Why Texas Police Should Stop Partnering with Immigration Enforcement

Participating in the program undermines community trust and safety.When sheriff's deputies engage in immigration enforcement, fewer people report crimes for fear of being deported, thus jeopardizing community safety and trust. In fact, a study of how increased police involvement with immigration enforcement found 70 percent of undocumented immigrants are less likely to contact authorities about a crime they have witnessed or endured for fear of being asked about their immigration status or worse, being taken into custody. By ending 287(g) programs, undocumented immigrants and their loved ones that reside in the community will feel safer from incrimination and will not have to be silent victims.    Prioritizing immigration enforcement neglects fighting violent crime. Community safety also becomes less of a priority when law enforcement uses their time and resources to participate in immigration enforcement rather than combating violent, more urgent crime in their community. Counties already struggle with funding local law enforcement operations; branching out to act as a deportation arm will stretch already limited resources such as jail space.    287(g) agreements drain county finances. Participating in the 287(g) program costs counties a significant sum of money. According to the American Immigration Council’s analysis on 287(g), state and local governments sustain most of the program’s costs.

Related Content

Press Release
Placeholder image
  • Free Speech and Pluralism

Texas Families File New Lawsuit to Stop Public School Districts From Displaying Ten Commandments